![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/881dc672-1a6f-417f-a18a-84763e525b41.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
I use it when I’m traveling and am on insecure WiFi.
However, it doesn’t let you pick your egress location,.so if you’re trying to get to PornHub in Texas, it won’t help.
I use it when I’m traveling and am on insecure WiFi.
However, it doesn’t let you pick your egress location,.so if you’re trying to get to PornHub in Texas, it won’t help.
Am I missing it, or is there no way to organize the Drawer, either by folder or tab?
Checkout https://infosec.exchange instead of blocking Threads, the admin made a second instance for people who wanted Threads blocked. Like 40 people migrated, lol
What is missing is that the podcast originally claimed it was entirely written and generated by AI. They only changed the story when they were sued.
And I don’t think any of their nude photos are appropriate for academic papers (unrelated to nudity research) either?
Yeah. The arbitration section of the agreement specifically says it only applies to US residents.
Your hyperbole makes it obvious you have no place in a reasonable debate about this topic.
I love when people conflate rights and ethics. I agree with you that no one has a right to be listed on Fedi Garden. And I still think it’s not nice to pressure admins into taking choice away from users.
“I don’t think it’s nice to federate with a company that has been cited in multiple independent reports of massacres/genocides,”
And I don’t think it’s nice to take the choice away from users. I can block threads all on my own – I don’t need a nanny who doesn’t even cite their sources.
Your entire comment reads as a refute of OPs criticism and an excuse for Meta’s actions. If you were agreeing with OPs criticism, you would typically use phrases like “only five years”.
And? Why take active steps to stop it from working instead of just stopping technical support? Oh yeah, to get more money.
I’m more concerned that the company decided it was OK to meld the “From:” line of her email (asking for support) into her profile. If they think that’s an appropriate way to handle PII, I don’t trust them.
I hate patent trolls, but I will say “it couldn’t have happened to a nicer company”. I hope they both go broke on legal fees.
Misread that as “cat” and thought I was in for a cute satire, not a boring dystopia.
Not at all! I had to use ID.me for unemployment and it skeeved me out too.
They’re working to improve login.gov to support the level of user verification needed for this service, but it isn’t there yet. Hopefully next year when tax time rolls around again.
deleted by creator
It should be illegal to use an AI in the hiring process that can’t explain its decisions accurately. There’s too much of a risk of bias in training data to empower a black box system. ChatGPT can lie, so anything powered by it is out.
Seems like you’re asserting that the article is sponsored content without being disclosed, in violation of FTC guidelines. Seems like a pretty serious claim that borders on libel. Do you have any proof of your allegations?
I switched all my domains to Porkbun. No way I’m hanging out in Squarespace land.