• Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    That’s their point, how do you get such a heavy thing to orbital speed without spending all that energy? You can’t unless you build it from materials harvested in space.

    • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Oh, I apologise, I suffered some curse of knowledge there, the answer is time.

      A blast is a release of energy over a short time, the whole point of building weapons is to store and handle energy in safe amounts over time.

      Global electric energy consumption is about 200 PJ a day, approximately the same as the Tsar Bomba, but there’s no risk for a huge explosion neither when you incinerate trash or turn off the AC.

      Because time.

      Although we could explode a nuke and propel things ballistically, it turns out it’s a lot easier to use rockets. A rocket, although carrying frightening amounts of fuel and exploding spectacularly when it fires wrong, has several safeguards to not expend all that fuel at once. And also gives the opportunity to correct course along the way.

      Now imagine that the same amount of energy has been expended many many many times over the course of the space era, and almost any mass in orbit has serious potential for damage.

      For example, the MIR was 130 tons, orbiting at about 7,8 km/s, for a kinetic energy of 4 TJ, and another 235 GJ of potential energy. Totalling about a tenth of Little Boy that levelled Hiroshima.

      Edit: Specifying and correcting the global energy consumption.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Right, and tungsten rods are dangerous because they don’t slow down and burn up in the atmosphere like most spacecraft do (like you said, spreading out that energy over time and space). As long as you can deorbit them accurately, they are devastating since they convert the entire orbital potential energy into surface kinetic energy all at once. (Oddly, orbital potential energy and surface kinetic energy are the same thing, just from different points of reference.)

        • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Agreed. On all points.

          Moreover, the Tungsten rods are quite dense and thus small, and thus very hard to spot on radar or hit with countermeasures.

      • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        One of the things that’s stuck with me during my time on Lemmy is someone remarking that the only difference between a battery and a bomb is how controlled the release of energy is. Having seen what happens when you puncture a LiPo battery, I believe it 😰