Guess we have something to look forward to in 2028.
Man who publicly restricts his freedom has his freedom publicly restricted.
On a more serious note though: why is sharing his name and face necessary or even allowed? Seems like it’ll result in consequences greater than what the court has deemed appropriate to dole out.
Jurisprudence Fetishist Gets Off On Technicality
Man who publicly restricts his freedom has his freedom publicly restricted.
Masochist tased, bondage enthusiast shackled.
I agree. The UK is usually pretty robust about name suppression. Maybe he wasn’t powerful enough.
The earlier story linked makes him sound vulnerable:
Hunt also told the court on the two nights he had been seen on the side of the road he had wanted to kill himself by being hit by a car.
“It never entered my head that what I was doing was frightening people,” he said.
“I apologise to those people - I agree what I was doing was frightening but hand on my heart I never intended to cause them harassment, alarm or distress.”
why is sharing his name and face necessary or even allowed?
Open justice?
Do you have a loicence for that wriggling and writhing?
I wonder what leads you to the place in your life where this is what you want to do