• Alto@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not sure why this guy’s so reluctant to accept something that sticking a bunch of high voltage cables in a swamp isn’t something Iraq would’ve done in that war. I don’t even mean in a “oh they did immoral things way”, I mean in a “they were basically doing ACME shit the entire war” way.

    Did Iraq probably heavily inflate the number killed? Absolutely. Even if they weren’t trying to, they had tons of barbed wire and floating mines in that swamp, so kinda hard to distinguish what killed who when all you care about is building corpse road. But they also absolutely electrified a swamp during the battle of the marshes, and it absolutely did kill people.

    • GiveOver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh I don’t put it past Iraq, I’m sure they’d have been up for it. I’m just reluctant to accept the physics

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m just reluctant to accept the physics

        Why?

        I think you are misunderstanding the nature of electrical grounding. If they had laid wires at the bottom of the marsh, then yes it likely would have grounded. However if you float the wires to the surface then the water and the nonconductive particles in the water act as resistors. When the soldier enters the area they act as a conductor, acting as the path of least resistance from the source to the ground.

        It’s pretty basic physics.