• bitofhope@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I agree, except with the first sentence.

    1. I don’t think a computer program has passed the Turing test without interpreting the rules in a very lax way and heavily stacking the deck in the bot’s favor.
    2. I’d be impressed if a machine does something hard even if the machine is specifically designed to do that. Something like proving the Riemann hypothesis or actually passing an honest version of Turing test.
      • bitofhope@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Any of… what?

        Yea I don’t think the Turing test is that great for establishing genuine artificial intelligence, but I also maintain that current state of the art doesn’t even pass the Turing test to an intellectually honest standard and certainly didn’t in the 60s.