Yes indeed.

I seriously doubt that.

I do not dress to suit the amish. And I do not speak to suit these gender-obsessives. Towards that sort of dictation, no, I do not practice tolerance.

But I do tolerate those who think (dress, live etc ) differently from me to peacefully do their thing.

(To clear up your equivocation there.)

This seems sane to me. How about you?

You are still avoiding my point.

That’s pretty weak.

Nonsense. You are simply avoiding my point.

Removed by mod

They’re both loony.

Gender-concerned people telling me how to speak is like fundamentalists telling me to wear a dress. I tell them both to piss up a rope.

So you’re saying that the loonys care.

Loony for. Loony against. Twins, basically.

Oh keep it in your pants. Just answer the question.

You are asking us to tolerate the intolerant.

How does that differ from plural they?

It isn’t a problem because you’ve mastered the skill? Or it isn’t a problem because you dgaf?

What’s up with all the masks? Do they want to be anonymous?

A billion years ago we figured out acquisition. Grab all the stuff.

A million years ago we figured out language.

Now we use language for acquisition. If we do that efficiently enough we can convert language to acquisition 100%. Which deletes all value from the language for us. But what a great business!

Meditate more

And you found it so darn offensive that you needed to ignore my point and insult me. I sympathize.

Whenever anybody tries to talk about anything strange and significant you people get defensive. It’s as if you actually prefer to be boring, mediocre and shitty. You’ve got a deathgrip on it.

Most of us use “mind” to refer to intellect. The thing we think with, where all the ideas are.

But the Buddhists are referring to your “attention”. Like a flashlight, you direct it at stuff. Sights, sounds, thoughts, etc.

That’s 2 quite different things. “Open your mind” is a different thing there.

So you are the source of the issue. But you are not in control of yourself.