pflanzenregal

I only know that I was pleasantly surprised how well GNOME ran on a surface device of a friend.

Why not?

Why is this in c/Lemmy Shitposting?

It’s funny how my brain makes the cat look huge whenever I focus on the CAT logo.

As it probably has internalized the size of things with this logo

I don’t.

Explain please. What’s the true meaning and what’s the intended one?

deleted by creator

Why downvote him? He made an observation and comments even explained why. I learned something, it added to the discussion.

I think it must be a trabslatranslation error or so, because yeah you should NEVER touch live if you’re grounded haha 😅

Speaks to the fact that we apparently need better and new alternatives or make current tools easier to use.

Certain aspects of discord seem to resonate with people (unfortunately…).

Man pages are great as mentioned, but maybe not as accessible to some people. Are there tools to generate more convenient resources (e.g. wikis) from that? Similar to how generating technical documentations from (structured) code comments.

That’s true (y)

I think this is more a case of the triangle inequality in metric spaces, as you don’t have to calculate any particular edge to see the shortcut, as well as that it applies to any even non-rectangular triangle.

Do you know why?

Thanks :) Would’ve thought you’d quote “English people” but now that I think about it this also makes sense :p

One, why did you quote people?

Just use a VPN bro and you’re fine /s

Hello, as I said, it’s about “security by design”, which means to design a system that ‘doesn’t allow for insecure things’ in the first place. Like a microwave oven doesn’t operate when the door is open. IT-/cyber-security is a complex field, but 2FA is a good place to start, regarding user facing services. There are lots more things than that of course.

That’s exactly right. I was about to say how people usually don’t even “not take it seriously” but rather don’t even think or know about it. But you already said that yourself haha :D

The lions share IMHO is at 23&me. Offering such a poorly secured service is negligence, in the face of the data’s high sensitivity nature.

This shouldn’t be “offered” IMHO, this should be mandatory. Yes, people are very ignorant about cyber security (I’ve studied in this field, trust me, I know). But the answer isn’t to put the responsibility on the user! It is to design products and services which are secure by design.

If someone is actually able to crack accounts via brute-forcing common passwords, you did not design a secure service/product.

[Edit: spelling]