I was confused why a package manager would need to import posts from a social network.
Why name a new product the same as a very popular existing product?
I was confused why a package manager would need to import posts from a social network.
Why name a new product the same as a very popular existing product?
And the cover was mostly to keep the phone form getting dirty when not in use, not to protect it when dropped.
I was hitchhiking in Turkey with my now wife many years ago and we got picked up by a bunch of truckers. They passed our destination and kept going, pretending they don’t understand what we’re saying when we kept calling “stop.” Only when I pulled out my phone did they stop. Luckily they didn’t notice my phone was dead.
It’s not. If you’re really into pop culture and you frequently make such references then someone who is not will have a hard time communicating with you.
It’s not about internet culture being bad, it’s about the communication gap between people with very different cultural references.
Not likely a real person, or an edit that was reverted.
On one had, responding like that is definitely a sign that it’s not going to work. On the other hand, that’s a perfectly normal feeling for a person who doesn’t live their life on the internet.
It’s not lying or hallucinating. It’s describing exactly what it found in search results. There’s an web page with that title from that date. Now the problem is that the web page is pinterest and the title is the result of aggressive SEO. These types of SEO practices are what made Google largely useless for the past several years and an AI that is based on these useless results will be just as useless.
sounds like you’re contradicting yourself there
Where’s the contradiction?
not sure how that’s an “American” idea
That’s where I heard this perspective from. That you either believe in science or in God, not both. I guess it’s because of all the weird Christian denominations in the US that say crazy things and seem to have never actually read the bible, but use it to justify their anti-science ideas.
God’s existence, by definition, cannot be proven or disproven. That’s the nature of faith and free will (in the theological sense). And that’s why there are scientists who believe in God. This American idea that religion and science are opposites makes no sense.
it doesn’t just have to be grape wine either
People in my country make hard spirits out of various fruits, but mostly plums, and in English those are being translated as fruit brandy.
Although if you want to make cognac (a type of brandy), it has to be grape wine.
Cognac, like Champagne, is about where it’s made, not just the recipe. I has to be made out of specific varieties of grapes harvested and fermented in the Cognac area in France. You can import the same grapes and follow the same recipe, but you’re not allowed to name it Cognac if you made it outside that area.
I like that there’s a name for it. I always try to do that if possible. Division by 25? You mean multiply by 4 and divide by 100. Convert miles to km? That’s x + x/2 + x/10.
Not sure if qualify as old geezer, you never know on the internet. I’m old for most people here, but you mention Excel, so you sound closer to my age :)
So an extension of the x * 5 = x/2 * 10 shortcut
In a 2018 review, data from 12 studies (8,003 participants) showed acupuncture was more effective than no treatment for back or neck pain, and data from 10 studies (1,963 participants) showed acupuncture was more effective than sham acupuncture. The pain-relieving effect of acupuncture was comparable to that of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/acupuncture-what-you-need-to-know
That’s why wikipedia feel sluggish sometimes
Images on articles are resized. The original size of the image has no bearing on how fast the article loads.
I like how you and FQQD each censored the other’s name in your posts.
How are crashlytics and firebase analytics profiting off of users? I cannot imagine not including those in an app you’re actually hoping to improve.
I am curious how you’d deal with the ambiguity of contractions vs. ending single quotes
That’s the thing, nobody even asks this question.
you could just match on
/[a-zA-Z]+/
That would already put you in the top 10% of solutions I’ve seen so far on this problem.
That is totally a non-trivial problem, which requires a lot more conception before it can be solved.
Most candidates don’t realize that. And when I say they split by single space I mean split(' ')
. Not even split(/\s+/)
.
Does “don’t” consist of one or two words? Should “www.google.com” be split into three parts? Etc.
Yes, asking those questions is definitely what you should be doing when tackling a problem like this.
If I got that feature request in a ticket, I’d send it back to conception.
If I got it, I’d work together with the product team to figure out what we want and what’s best for the users.
If you asked me this question in an interview, I’d ask if you wanted a programmer, a requirements analysis, or a linguist and why you invite people for a job interview if you don’t even know what role you are hiring for.
That would be useful too. Personality, attitude, and ability to work with others in a team are also factors we look at, so your answer would tell me to look elsewhere.
But to answer that question, I’m definitely not looking for someone who just executes on very clear requirements, that’s a junior dev. It’s what you do when faced with ambiguity that matters. I don’t need the human chatGPT.
Also, I’m not looking for someone perfectly solving that problem, because it doesn’t even have a single clear solution. It’s the process of arriving to a solution that matters. What questions do you ask? Which edge cases did you consider and which ones did you miss? How do you iterate on your solution and debug issues you run into on the way? And so on
regarding the logos bit - have you never had a profound realisation that happened so quickly in your brain and on the level of pure emotion (instead of words)
Logos means word. That is the confusion I was talking about. If you experience something as pure words then it should be extremely easy to verbalize.
You use toilet paper to dry off? Why not a towel?