Plot twist: it’s the neighbor’s dog
Plot twist: it’s the neighbor’s dog
I thought they taste like chicken? Well, there is only one way to find out…
Don’t worry, this isn’t about you, you are fine. It’s about me and it’s true.
Does he remember? Ask him, that would be interesting from a scientific perspective
From what I have found, the US has 216mm × 279mm while Canada has 215mm × 280mm which is close enough.
I’m glad you admit yourself it’s not a thing
‘How much energy does it take to boil a room-temperature gallon of water?’
Is that something people wonder about? I doubt it.
Some people will use some letter salad just to avoid the imperial system /s
I am in that picture and I don’t like it
I don’t even know if I play it. It’s a double blind experiment I’m involved in
You call it fart, I call it freedom
I love how the commenter above me already agreed with me but you still feel the need to defend them for no reason.
They used the term Utopian Socialism, not implying that they were Marxist. There are more than two ways. Kropotkin for example was neither. All you’re saying is “he wasn’t Marxist so he was Utopian” which is wrong as I and the commenter above me already agreed on.
You can even be Marxist and still reject Historical Materialism as John the Duncan does even tho he sadly never dedicated a video on that, just hints it here and there.
I don’t know what you mean by the bolsheviks “burning Communism”
I said “burning the term communism” as in you can’t use it anymore without thinking of bolshevism. The meme and the comment above mine said communism, not Marxism.
Otherwise you have proven my point that you have no understanding what so ever in his theory. He writes expansively about history and about the revolution and transition. Just because he doesn’t belong to your tradition, you lump him together with people he had little in common with.
Again, you’re using “Scientific” to refer to literal science, not the term as it relates to Socialism.
I never said I wasn’t. I even elaborated on that I reject Marxist Historical Materialism. What even is your point here?
His theory was Utopian, rejecting history as it develops and instead embracing the concept of there being some perfect society that can be adopted directly. This is Utopianism.
Well, did he? He didn’t write about history in Mutual Aid? And Conquest of Bread is not about a literal conquest but about adopting it directly? Do you even think before you write?
So you are housefree? Land of the free, indeed