If you don’t have your data house in order, AI is going to be less valuable than it would be if it was,” he said.

If your data house is in order, why do you need AI assistants to find your neatly organized information for you anyways?

I contest the use of derogatory “small dick energy” memes on the grounds of body inclusivity. Small dicks are valid, positive and worthy of appreciation.

Most depressing thing on the box is the alcohol percentage.

The wikipedia page you linked to actually states that the term is being pushed by industry (Google, Meta, OpenAI) and that its use is criticized by some researchers.

Underrated veggie imho. They’re amazing grilled. They give some kick to mashed potatoes. On the other hand, the sap from their plant causes serious blisters when exposed to sunlight and they’ve gone wild, turning into a problematic invasive specie in many regions. Evil carrot is about right.

And I accidentally misread this as Alegria

What’s this, a cat for ants?!

Oh Columbo

L’occasion fait le larron!

Oh to marvel once again at life as through the eyes of a child.

That guy is coding open source software on a 1998 bondi blue iMac.

Thank you! Wow, they were truly ahead of their time. 🙃

What is this cursed place? The clickbait has eaten everything. uBlock should make this into a blank page.

Nah it’s biohazard. If I had to guess I’d go for upcoming zombie apocalypse ground zero.

Signs get more severe as OP heads back home. Housing crisis and so on.

Reducing emotion to voice intonation and facial expression is trivializing what it means to feel. This kind of approach dates from the 70s (promoted namely by Paul Elkman) and has been widely criticized from the get-go. It’s telling of the serious lack of emotional intelligence of the makers of such models. This field keeps redefining words pointing to deep concepts with their superficial facsimiles. If “emotion” is reduced to a smirk and “learning” to a calibrated variable, then of course OpenAI will be able to claim grand things based on that amputated view of the human experience.

OK hear me out. If we’re gonna imagine, let’s go all in. So imagine there are no business districts, no dormitory towns and no food desert. There’s decent jobs and food stores in your neighbourhood so mostly you just walk.

Wrong article?

The actual research page is so awkward. The TLDR at the top goes:

single portrait photo + speech audio = hyper-realistic talking face video

Then a little lower comes the big red warning:

We are exploring visual affective skill generation for virtual, interactive characters, NOT impersonating any person in the real world.

No siree! Big “not what it looks like” vibes.

Yeah, their reporting suffers from not adequately defining what is being measured.