Except that the download numbers don’t correspond at all with the population numbers.
Except that the download numbers don’t correspond at all with the population numbers.
Huh, I thought I recently read China accused the US of tricking China into invading Taiwan but that they won’t take the bait.
I guess this is what ‘not taking the bait’ translates to in Chinese?
Surely they can’t both be true at the same time though, right? Either governments are rightfully not participating in a price-gouging racket, or they are cheapskates not willing to pay pharma companies.
Every rule has an exception.
That sure sounds like a rule with no exception
Impressive porn collection you got there.
I think if he tried they’d look like something out of a cartoon.
That’s not how it works. Right now the situation is: it doesn’t work. You claim it should be a workable situation. Show how it should work, don’t ask people to prove a negative.
Unless you bring a solution to the table, taking the position that it isn’t impossible is just cheap contrarianism on your part. Sure we can try new things, but if it doesn’t work and everyone is commenting the approach isn’t helping, then maybe take the hint. Or not, and keep swimming against the stream (in which - seeing OP’s other comments - they seem to be more interested than actually solving the problem)
ITT: people giving wrong answers to a post linked to a blog that answers the question ‘What is PID 0?’
If someone is trying to achieve a goal through (what they might not know are) impossible means, “letting them be” isn’t going to help them.
Although it might not seem very helpful (and indeed there are better ways of helping) pointing out the flaws in the approach is contributing more than “letting them be”. Doesn’t cost a thing to be civil about it though.
“This is terrible, can someone please find Ja Rule ?”
Thumbnail alone is enough for me.
Talk about shooting yourself in the foot.
Hey, what else are you gonna do if you’re craving some prime rib.
What is a certainty was that a dozen+ candidates were murdered, but there weren’t any attempts of her or her family.
This means precisely nothing, as explained by the fallacy mentioned before.
It doesn’t make it untrue or very unlikely, though
But you called it ‘probably’ though, which is on the complete other end of the spectrum from ‘very unlikely’… (aside from it being very unlikely to me, if all I have to go on is unrelated events, someone not being dead, and nothing else)
She is still alive so she must’ve made a deal with the drugs cartel is a classic “Post hoc ergo propter hoc” fallacy. It is all speculation.
You have deduced incorrectly that I have any thought about her whatsoever. I’m merely pointing out that your reasoning is flawed and therefore invalid.
I’ve got this tiger-repelling rock to sell you.
Yes even the kids’ reactions generally seemed positive, some mentioned there were more conversations and joking going on in between classes, and cyber bullying was less prevalent (although ‘old school’ bullying seemed to make a comeback somewhat)
The title is phrased a little weird though, as if Ukraine is to be blamed for this cluster fuck of a situation.