in a startup model where product directly implements function requests from clients, it’d be the head of deciding which functions, sprints, priorities etc.
And/or ensuring that clients are handled well enough so they’re not at risk of churn at the q3/q4 turnaround.
Then define your terms, what is the mobility method, what are the bounds of the classes and by what metric and, what is excellent/great/good/average/poor/bad/terrible mobility?
Appropriately for the meme - also both boomers.
why do we hate the us government
uhhhh where do you wanna start. I mean pick a year between 1776 and now. Pick a month, probably.
they said that about suffrage and women’s suffrage too.
I feel like I’m starting to see way more sympathetic comments than I did a year ago.
If there’s no way to get to the top, how is the upward mobility “great”?
interesting, how does one become a billionaire in such a way that anyone and everyone could do it?
not at home but I believe there’s a few that run in docker.
my wife got a few hundred bucks from a feminine hygiene product, unless you count that as “cents on the dollar” meaning a percentage of the final amount - in which case, that’s the case in every settlement.
it’s also like 2 hours compared to 2 minutes.
ex Londoner here, I can plot that route in my head by walking around Clapham Common station where I used to live.
what hasn’t been mentioned so far is that his main business plan is get little children into gambling
I think the issue was making it usable / marketable without technical knowledge.
A better path would have been to keep it as a technical ML tool where the LLM is only used to interpret unstructured data.
Consider this: I pick up a tennis racket and a tennis ball, so does my wife, we go to a tennis court, I hit the ball to her gently, she hits it back: Are we playing tennis or not?
If we are not, what are we doing?
And yet it’s nowhere near the level of Serena Williams, or even the local semi Pro tournament, or probably even the local tennis club.
why does it have it be good, or more accurately for this conversation- why do you have to like it for it even to exist and have a name?
I dont particularly care for The Wiggles, or for Machine Gun Kelly, but both of them produce music. Just because I don’t like it, or think it’s not good doesn’t mean it’s not music. Even a child slowly, shakily playing a basic C major scale and getting it wrong is still “music.” Its not Mozart but it still exists.
There is no “point” or “value” you can attach to tennis, music or sculpture - or other forms and media of art, entertainment, sport, science etc that means it suddenly becomes that. Art you don’t like is still art.
Damn this guy was prolific in the DMs.
ah yes, being able to survive being hit with a hammer, what everyone is looking for from art.
Blackheads, heartbreak and psorisis - Christ, you don’t know the meaning of heartbreak buddy come on come on
that people with LiveJournals are insufferable twats
deleted by creator
and the people who know exactly how to waste time in an office.