Seems this time we’ll likely evade the resident weevil
Seems this time we’ll likely evade the resident weevil
What was the name of that episode again?
“Planet of the 80s” I think
Where can you see lions… Only in Kenya!
“Honk honk bitches” just got me kicked out of the library
I decided not to buy it yet.
Old enough that I’ve never seen the episode.
Well, if he’s going to walk about all the time without trousers, what does he expect?
Husband got me one last valentine’s day. I have to be a little careful about where I wear it.
That’s the really stupid part of all this.
Small amount of money massive personal and political consequences. Hilariously stupid.
Is enrichment turning one isotope into another or when you separate out the different isotopes?
I know Iran has centrifuge technology for this became Mossad sabotaged them a while back.
Is it like when you concentrate orange juice by removing the water?
The first rule of god club is you have to continuously talk about god club
A mystery to himself it seems
Detail counts!
Its a simple law. If your party has received evidence that your clai is false. You must stop using it or face legal punishment.
Let us reflect on how parties might react to this and how a simple law might not achieve your aims.
Another wrinkle is deciding who is going to police this, who is the arbiter of truths and lies?
In almost every case I can think of, political parties already avoid lying.
With statistics they can find the right one to backup their point and ignore the other study which contradicts them. They offer opinions, points of view, oversimplificatios and predictions.
None of these are lies. Manipulation of the same family certainly. It was true that we sent £350 million per week to the EU, except it really wasn’t and yet if you offered evidence that it was a lie it’d be easy to produce evidence that it wasn’t. Truth is complex.
Add to this we have a mechanism built into democracy that is intended to punish parties who lie or otherwise behave this way, its the voters. For this to work we need an informed and aware population to vote in elections, your post suggests you don’t see the voters as capable of this?
To achieve an informed electorate who understands complexity and nuance getting out of the simple mindset of right and wrong is needed, away from simple truths and lies.
In short… “Examine a law not for the good it will do if correctly applied but for the harm it will cause if incorrectly applied”
Reform most likely, possibly for the Tories.
It’s going to be funny either way I’m sure.
Thanks for sharing that, the physiological stuff seems to be the hardest to live with, as it’s impossible to ignore or control.
Make the case?
I’m not campaigning.
Its art, make of it whatever you wish!