• 7 Posts
  • 85 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 28th, 2024

help-circle




















  • Its a simple law. If your party has received evidence that your clai is false. You must stop using it or face legal punishment.

    Let us reflect on how parties might react to this and how a simple law might not achieve your aims.

    Another wrinkle is deciding who is going to police this, who is the arbiter of truths and lies?

    In almost every case I can think of, political parties already avoid lying.

    With statistics they can find the right one to backup their point and ignore the other study which contradicts them. They offer opinions, points of view, oversimplificatios and predictions.

    None of these are lies. Manipulation of the same family certainly. It was true that we sent £350 million per week to the EU, except it really wasn’t and yet if you offered evidence that it was a lie it’d be easy to produce evidence that it wasn’t. Truth is complex.

    Add to this we have a mechanism built into democracy that is intended to punish parties who lie or otherwise behave this way, its the voters. For this to work we need an informed and aware population to vote in elections, your post suggests you don’t see the voters as capable of this?

    To achieve an informed electorate who understands complexity and nuance getting out of the simple mindset of right and wrong is needed, away from simple truths and lies.

    In short… “Examine a law not for the good it will do if correctly applied but for the harm it will cause if incorrectly applied”