Was going to choose 1, then I noticed that it is “you get ears and tail” and now I’m like…
I already have ears will I get additional ears? Where will they be, and how they will be like?
So now I am lost pondering this important questions
Was going to choose 1, then I noticed that it is “you get ears and tail” and now I’m like…
I already have ears will I get additional ears? Where will they be, and how they will be like?
So now I am lost pondering this important questions
I’m now picturing a future where humans learn and use behaviour from AIs that are just not that good at reproducing human behaviour.
The future sounds confusing
It looks promising, even though it is quite far away from becoming available to the general public.
Still I wish that there was more of a push for something like a contraceptive pill for men. It feels like it has been ignored for years and only now they are starting a bit with development and trials…
Nice article.
I feel though that, as many others, it compares the carbon footprint of production (panels and batteries) vs the footprint of burning only. By looking at the source of the carbon footprint, it seems that they take into account only the CO2 output of the energy factories, but extraction, transportation and storage has a non-negligible carbon footprint.
Ignoring the technology itself, I found it interesting that it has a lot less trouble with verbs compared to nouns (tho the article does not give much information about it).
Would it mean that humans keeps actions very separate (even if similar), while keeping things and concepts more clustered together? Is being precise on what is happening much more important than clearly specifying the subject and object of the action?
Thank you for doing what I was too lazy to do.
I agree that 4 random pills is the best choice, also it is not specified that you must consume them (so if you get something bad you just dump or sell it).