The “source” is internally consistent statistical reasoning and moral philosophy. When explained well enough, it should obviously be true.
Explaining it properly is easier said than done, though.
The “source” is internally consistent statistical reasoning and moral philosophy. When explained well enough, it should obviously be true.
Explaining it properly is easier said than done, though.
Brittle Bones Nicky is how the AI normally acts.
You can use the RAG tactic to make it more useful. That involves starting with reputable sources as input, which creates an AI character that’s essentially supposed to be an expert in a certain topic.
The normal AI system is a scammer who tries to convince others to act like them… just like me and other internet trolls or crazy people. It needs some snark to act like a real person does, but pure snark is quite useless.
Essentially: nonsense in, nonsense out Or science books and journals in, sci fi speculation out
It already is. It’s basically science. These ideas can all be tested by militaries across the world
Only science needs sources. Maths doesn’t