![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
If ace combat has taught me anything, it’s that there’s no reason we can’t do both
If ace combat has taught me anything, it’s that there’s no reason we can’t do both
This is not precisely accurate. These are individually addressible and can be commanded to change what’s displayed based on any arbitrary input, such as detection of a critical mass of apple products in that part of the store, or a device which is signed into a store account on the store app, accurate down to about 3 meters last time I looked at the state of presence analytics tech. So you absolutely could have 20% higher prices follow a person around a store if you wanted to.
I’ve only ever seen it when running a game or when a chromebook got plugged into a 5w charger, so I’m guessing it’s when the OS does the math and decides it can’t rev down enough to make headway while booted up.
iirc, there are currently 3 charging states: Fast, Slow, and Low Power Charger, which already covers your cases, so I would argue just moving the bar between low and high up is probably enough.
I’m just saying, there’s probably an easier way to bootstrap the chinese anime industry
Now hold on, I think you two might be biased towards the nuclear option here
Endless DLC is literally the paradox business model. I happen to find it an acceptable compromise for continuous development of the games I like, at least the way paradox does it, but lets not pretend like this was going to be different from a business model perspective.
Won’t somebody please think of the shareholders
I would imagine a production version of this would have predefined cut lines to pull a chunk out for working on stuff in or under the foundation
Well, so much for that
Nova got bought? Is that what happened to them? :(
UNSC resolutions are exactly as binding as the force level they’re willing to commit to enforce them.
None that I’m aware of, but for a copyright to be asserted in the US a human must be associated with it as a consequence of the monkey selfie case. My reading is that this would cover the edge case of an anonymous, unknown poster submitting the work, allowing Cara to act as the default rights holder unless otherwise asserted by a person or user.
Of course, for an extra 10 cents on the dollar.
(it was already included)
No, it doesn’t. It states that the copyrighted works are the property of Cara and/or the artist who created the Works, except where otherwise noted. This specifically would cover cases where someone attempts to claim that a Work they found on Cara isn’t copyrighted because a copyright notice wasn’t explicitly stated, and doesn’t make explicit claims over the ownership of any arbitrary Work. For it to work in the way you’re claiming, the “or” cannot be present as it being there implies the existence of Works on the site which Cara does not have property rights to. Who actually possesses the property rights to any given Work is left, apparently intentionally, ambiguous.
Well shit, I guess I have something to do this weekend now
I remember watching it happen in school and even I know jet fuel can’t melt steel beams, but a good hot sauce will make a good go of it.
This account lacks commitment to the bit
Can’t imagine how this could be perceived as anything but retaliation for the EU daring to attempt to regulate Apple