• 0 Posts
  • 1.02K Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 22nd, 2023

help-circle







  • since people are yelling about it.

    It’s probably not blatantly bypassing security and privacy features, what it is PROBABLY doing is using the user to bypass them by simply manipulating them to do it.

    Social engineering is way easier than whatever bullshit you would need to do to bypass sandboxing and dynamically recompile, or whatever people are claiming, and my guess would be that this is what they’re doing.

    If the suit is claiming they are doing what i said, that’s probably legal, and not going anywhere, unless tiktok ban bill 2.0. If the suit is claiming what others are claiming, it’s still probably wrong and probably going to be tiktok ban bill 2.0.

    Unfortunately these things aren’t all that exciting at the end of the day.



  • if you actually look into what the insurance industries do for crash safety testing it’s actually kind of fucked up.

    Because they basically started with full frontal impacts at n speed, that was met, so a decade later they were like “half frontal impacts are a thing now” and turns out most cars performed pretty bad on that, so they fixed that, and like a decade later again, they were fine, and then they were like “oh no, now quarter impact frontal is bad now” and then that’s what they’ve recently fixed.

    So most of car safety seems to be for pretty specific, though i suppose “more likely” impacts.










  • the reason why mass matters is because if you have more mass, let’s say twice the mass of a sedan for example, you transfer significantly more energy into the smaller vehicle, and the smaller vehicle transfers significantly less energy into the large vehicle.

    go find a video of a freight training crashing into a car or something at a crossing. There’s a reason freight trains don’t have crumple zones.