Oh gosh. Forgot all about that shit. No thanks.
Do AMD not realise that Linux/Privacy nerds stuck with them regardless for years. Would they have survived without that loyalty?
Oh gosh. Forgot all about that shit. No thanks.
Do AMD not realise that Linux/Privacy nerds stuck with them regardless for years. Would they have survived without that loyalty?
But they are forks and they rely on Firefox development. Using them is fine, but with Mozilla funding and keeping up with browser development, they’d be poor
Its a bit like Brave taking Chromium, changing a few lines and saying “we built a browser”.
I’m assuming because they don’t have those AI engineers. I don’t agree with this or AI, but diversification isn’t something that can be ignored.
They need to focus on browser and bet on things that could succeed in the future. Winding down those bets that failed (like 3d visual worlds) is sensible.
Of the 60 they are laying off, how many of those work on Firefox?
This isn’t a new thing. He was late declaring donors for the leadership. Media ignored it because they hate the left of the Labour Party.
This guy is far from squeeky clean. Fortunately for him, what he follows is far worse.
They can also use Yahoo or Bing as default for money.
The other option is diversify your revenue. Which is likely where the ad stuff comes in. If they can do that in a privacy respecting way with a facility to opt out, I have no objections. The loss of the biggest open source chromium alternative is massive and unthinkable.
For all the flaws of Mozilla, no one has forked, done better and put it out of business. It’s easier to run it behind a keyboard with zero responsibility.
I’ve felt this for a while.
When dirty tricks are at play, it’s best to resist.
Don’t get me wrong, they’ve made some bad decisions, but the world is a darker place without them.
Maybe, but Intel operates there so the labour pool is probably quite skilled already. Perhaps good supply chains too.
Most of the smaller banks in the UK are gone. We don’t have a lot of “town banks”.
The risks to the US may be very different from here. Either that or you could be guilty of catastrophising.
Hyperinflation doesn’t happen that quick.
Not all banks go pop at once. Usually when banks go bust in UK, the gov steps in, recovers them and sells after. Many banks are perceived as too big to fail.
False, and I’ll assume you are American.
In the UK, you are protected up to £85k per bank.
https://www.fscs.org.uk/what-we-cover/
Government regulation can protect people. I know that concept seems crazy in USA.
They claimed it because she was married to a CIA employee.
Kind of free reign to break the law and kill people if you’re a relative of a CIA employee. She could have been trialed without any risk to national security, so it’s absolutely a BS excuse.
As Don Lemon found out, Elon doesnt like uncomfortable questions. He likes attention though.
Not so much in the case of the killer of Harry Dunn.
Labour does have a process for policies. It is called the National Policy Forum. He ignores it. So your suggestion that you can push internally is false. Keir doesn’t tolerate dissent because he’s an autocrat.
Labour used to get most funding from unions, it’s now less than 30%, so wealthy business folk got control of that.
It’s a shame that Keir’s labour doesn’t have policies that aren’t cruel on people.
That poster has a point. I’m a Brit here, so no skin in the game. You’re more focussed on being right that trying to comprehend that people look at things differently.
No one thought Biden was good, but he was the candidate and most know that name recognition is key in US elections. Most presential candidates fail on their first run. Kamala, despite having some OK polling numbers still has to get through to disengaged American voters who do not follow politics and probably know little more than the attack lines heropponents will throw at her this campaign. They have to define her before others do. This option is riskier than you realise, the only thing that changed was Biden became a riskier option than before.
Things are less black and white than you want them to be. Nuance and grey area is key, despite being inconvenient.
Yup, and for the avoidance of doubt:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg3j131327yo (see graph at bottom)
Labour used to be funded by trade unions. Now it’s just a 5th of total funding. Corporate takeover of the Labour party. Of course, businesses will be wanting a return on investment here.
So Tories screwed our economic situations and Keir’s Labour will keep us here.
What is the point in a massive majority if you’ll do what the predecessors did? Power for power’s sake?
Streeting is a Tory with a red rosette. From the right-wing Blairite faction (Progress) and one of the most disloyal and unprofessional politicians when Corbyn was leader.
Expectations of better in this guy would be misplaced.
We can debate this all day long but we all know torque is cheap.
For many years AMD was uncompetitive compared to Intel / Nvidia. Intel had 80% of the market at one point. It probably would have died off if it wasn’t for folk that wanted Linux compatibility. Many run FOSS because of privacy. Linux is a key part of that.