I think it’s fine to not know Western Chess, I wouldn’t get a Janggi joke in the wild
I think it’s fine to not know Western Chess, I wouldn’t get a Janggi joke in the wild
Gross, she needs to wash her sheets and mattress
Because it’s not theirs
Google’s image format
It’s smaller than png which a company that shows images really likes because it’s cheaper so to force adoption they convert a bunch of images to .webp on google images
The problem is that 1. It hadn’t been adapted anywhere so people would have to convert it back to png to use 2. It is worse in every aspect to jxl files so Google has had to block the adaptation of jxl on the web as much as they can (jxl retains more quality and is half the size of webp)
Currently only webkit browsers support jxl out of the box. Firefox has had it in their nightly builds for years now but have never moved it into standard
Federation is bad in all use cases
Also unix philosophy
Yes, though each of those should be their own company so if steam wants forums they should be able to put someone’s website in their launcher, if they want people to buy games then they should be able to embed someone’s store in their launcher…etc
Individual self-hosting plan $9.90/month
Rap has it’s roots in punk because they were the only clubs that allowed them to perform at the time
Expensive though
It’s teasing and it’s fine
I am sure if you have friends then you are used to ribbing
That’s a pure monopoly
A monopolistic market can occur when…what I previously said
That’s all online shopping
That’s what all users want
You can add non-Steam games to the client if you want.
Oh so it’s not a store, it’s just a launcher like Heroic…wait no, it’s still a problem
Any client should be able to implement part of steam into it and any part of steam should be a standalone company
No it doesn’t
A company can be a monopoly when they include so many features that new competition can’t compete
Selective advertising redirects
I cannot fathom how you absolutely nailed the essence of my comment, yet misunderstood it (and - arguably - your own example) so fundamentally.
People do criticize Microsoft for using open source data to train LLMs, just like people criticize murder
Hence the query about having never been on the internet before
“Why does no one say murder is bad unless China is murdering”
Isn’t a good anti-murder argument
Are you just trying to make a bad pro-China argument or have you never been online before?
Which is either a boomer talking about zoomers because they’re too young to own irons vs anything of higher priority or some random person confessed to not ironing and thinks everyone does
It has no merit
It wasn’t so they could eat
She didn’t know they would kill her little friends and was horrified when she found out