True, but not paying for maintenance sure does help the executive hit his quarterly numbers to receive a bonus
True, but not paying for maintenance sure does help the executive hit his quarterly numbers to receive a bonus
Please try not using initialisms that a general audience won’t know. That’s why i had to look up the previous one and quoted the info so other people wouldn’t have to look it up also. USV doesn’t even show up in a googling
EDIT
I found it, USV means a drone boat
“A close-in weapon system (CIWS) is a point-defense weapon system for detecting and destroying short-range incoming missiles and enemy aircraft which have penetrated the outer defenses, typically mounted on a naval ship. Nearly all classes of larger modern warships are equipped with some kind of CIWS device.”
Great idea! Accessibility matters!
Imagine after an invasion of England someone said to him “you should rethink your goal of trying to reclaim London and Yorkshire”
I think it’s great that this has been captioned so deaf people can appreciate it too
Mac is easier than Windows, sure, but not easier than a chromebook. Nothing is simpler than a Chromebook. You can do much more with a Mac, but a chromebook is much easier.
Then her situation isn’t applicable to this topic
Sounds like all she needs is a dirt cheap chromebook then
So then the only way to make it fair is for us to invest equally as much into our own green energy industries
Britain’s richest family has got to be the royals, right? Some wacky paperwork might make it look like it’s not that way, but i have to assume that that’s the case unless an in depth investigation specifically proves that it ISN’T true.
What are the big mbin instances? I can’t seem to find any
I’m not seeing what you’re seeing
From what I’ve heard they’re the same bed size, but the newer one has a back seat area too
Well yes, but also some areas have made walking or biking nearly impossible. There are places with no sidewalks, places where there’s a giant road sitting between you and your destination with no way for pedestrians to get across it, etc. So yes, there are people who needlessly drive short distances, but often the problem is that an area was built in a way that makes non-driving travel methods hard, dangerous, or impossible
Sure, but OP worded their headline to sound like they were talking about the google payment system itself, which is not what this news is about
No, the standalone google pay APP is just having it’s features transitioned into google wallet. Google payment services is totally unchanged.
Quote:
Anywhere you normally use Google Pay — from checking out online to tapping and paying in stores — remains the same. If you use your Android phone to shop in stores where Google Pay is accepted, you can continue to tap to pay in stores with the Google Wallet app.
It all depends on the value of what you’re trying to secure, and if an attacker knows the value of what’s in the account, and if the attacker has access to hints about the password you used to narrow down the possibilities. The researchers knew all of that info and they still didn’t want to bother trying to crack the password until they found an additional way to narrow down the possibilities even further.
There’s no such thing as perfect security. A lock only needs to be strong enough to make it not worth breaking into for what’s in there
Wait, is that true? I mean it clearly would be significantly less effective, but would it really not have enough propulsion to go vaguely forward with enough force to penetrate into a body?