![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
“The bar was so low it was a tripping hazard in hell, and yet here you are, Limbo dancing with the devil.”
“The bar was so low it was a tripping hazard in hell, and yet here you are, Limbo dancing with the devil.”
Did you get the broom closet ending? The broom close ending was my favorite!
Bu there’s no sense crying over every mistake
We just keep on trying till we run out of cake.
wouldn’t be that difficult.
The amount of times I said that only to be quickly proven wrong by the fundamental forces of existence is the reason that’s going to be written on my tombstone.
I don’t think AI codecs will be anything revolutionary. There are plenty of lossless codecs already, but if you want more detail, you’ll need a better physical sensor, and I doubt there’s anything that can be done to go around that (that actually represents what exists, not an hallucination).
Stackoverflow is still very much impossible to replace. The amount of knowledge that it contains is simply too great to fall easily. And LLMs like ChatGPT aren’t even close to being as helpful as SO answers, specially on archaic libraries.
It’s extremely hard to give a machine a sense of morality without having to manually implement it on every node that constitutes their network. Current LLMs aren’t even aware of what they’re printing out, let alone understand the moral implications from that.
The day a machine is truly aware of the morality of what they say, in addition to actually understanding it, then we truly have AI. Currently, we have gargantuan statistical models that people glorify into nigh-godhood.
Sign my petition, damn it!
However, do keep in mind that LLMs regularly pull language an library features out of their asses that have no direct correspondent in practice. I’d use the LLMs to generate small snippets of code, giving them a small and restricted set of requirements to minimize hallucinations.
I have to use W11, but I use ExplorerPatcher to make it bearable.
Look at this fancy guy using an abacus. Everyone knows the superior way is to harness your own mind as your computer.
The dude who made the Task Manager? God damn, this dude singlehandedly carries Windows holy shit.
It does resemble socialism, but there are differences depending on the school of thought of Anarchism that you prefer It is not completely incompatible with individual property.
It is worse when you’re an anarchist. Best case, they say you’re a socialist. Worst case, they say you’re an extremist rioter.
Both are not true, but the later couldn’t be further from it.
Not a lot of money, but enough for him to call it a full time job.
I don’t know where they live, but in my country, they would be rich. Most people make less than 12k per year.
He’s not withering away fast enough.