• BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This is a good read. LLMs will never be true AI, so breaking the censorship is akin to fighting back against jack-booted cops who think they know what’s best for you and that you should obey, i.e. the big corporations that run these things.

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      LLMs are true AI. AI doesn’t mean what most people think it means. AI systems from sci-fi movies like HAL 9000, JARVIS, Ava, Mother, Samantha, Skynet, and GERTY are all AI, but more specifically, they are AGI (Artificial General Intelligence). AGI is always a type of AI, but AI isn’t always AGI. Even a simple chess-playing robot is an AI, but it’s a narrow intelligence - not general. It might perform as well as or better than humans at one specific task, but this ability doesn’t translate to other tasks. AI itself is a very broad category, kind of like the term ‘plants.’

        • jungle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 minutes ago

          No, he’s right, LLMs match the definition of AI. Terms like AI and AGI are not made up by corporations, they have specific meanings in computer science.

      • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 minutes ago

        A program predicting language replies using a lossy compression matrix is not intelligent.

        AI implies either sentience or sapience constructed outside of an organ. None of which is possible with machine learning large language models, it’s just math for now.