• Charapaso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Voting for the slightly less shit option makes it easier for the things we do in parallel to have a positive impact: direct action doesn’t get slowed down much by voting once a year or so.

    • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I won’t deny that people can do multiple things at once, I just don’t agree with the premise that voting matters in the current paradigm.

      • Charapaso@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t think it does much, but any tiny contribution to the fight against climate change is a good for the world, as is any slowing of the erosion of civil rights domestically, gutting of what remains of medicare/medicaid, etc.

        I also know a GOP administration will be worse in terms of fighting against leftist movements in the streets, if only slightly. They’re definitely worse re: labor movements overall, again: even if only marginally.

        So I’m not going to claim it’s a panacea, or even someone that will have notable effects, but I do think it matters at the margins, so the effort required is usually worth it, IMHO