Cripple. History Major. Vaguely Left-Wing.

  • 316 Posts
  • 672 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 21st, 2023

help-circle





  • You’re out of your depth here… Those reasons for affordable solar cells on earth in no way directly translate to applications in completely different environments (planets or moons)

    ‘on earth’

    Did you miss the bit where I specified space applications, or did you just ignore it?

    https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Preparing_for_the_Future/Space_for_Earth/Energy/Helium-3_mining_on_the_lunar_surface

    The Apollo programme’s own geologist, Harrison Schmidt, has repeatedly made the argument for Helium-3 mining, whilst Gerald Kulcinski at the University of Wisconsin-Madison is another leading proponent. He has created a small reactor at the Fusion Technology Institute, but so far it has not been possible to create the helium fusion reaction with a net power output.

    This idea of “well earth has solar, so solar must work just as well on the moon!” doesn’t take into account natural lunar resources (solar needs rare earth metals) , atmospheric conditions, thermal conditions, material transport, etc… Sure, a well-functioning moon settlement would probably have a combination of thermo, solar, and nuclear power,

    Holy fucking shit, dude, natural atmospheric and thermal conditions and material transport are exactly why nuclear power seems dubious to me as the basis for a moon base. I’m a proponent of nuclear power here on earth.

    but it is strange how you’re writing off one of the most promising forms of energy that excites and interests space scientists most.

    “Space scientists” here meaning ‘you’, apparently, since major investment into space-based nuclear power for earth-orbit and lunar applications has been very slim since the 60s despite niche applications and a small chorus of proponents, not unlike ‘Practical fusion in 20 years’ types.

    These issues you’re having just sound like cope due to the fact that the US is now lagging in space science.

    Uh. Okay.






  • In an unprecedented move, all three campaigns – including Tebboune’s – also issued a joint statement late Sunday alleging “irregularities” in ANIE’s results, adding they wanted to make the public aware of “vagueness and contradictions in the participation figures”.

    The preliminary results announced by ANIE said that Tebboune had won “94.65 percent of the vote”, with Hassani receiving 3.17 percent and Aouchiche 2.16 percent.

    The final results gave Hassani 9.56 percent of the votes, and Aouchiche 6.14 percent.

    … all of that is very concerning.







  • The problem with peace platforms is that they’re very hard to change. AMLO ran on a ‘hugs, not bullets’ platform towards dealing with the cartels - but the cartels aren’t misbehaving kids or disgruntled impoverished folk. The cartels, at this point, are rational, self-sustaining actors - which means no amount of hugs will induce them to ‘kill themselves’ by dismantling the fundamental roots of their operations.

    At the same time, such a peace platform means that any escalation will be called out as hypocrisy and blamed for any rise in cartel activity.

    It’s a trap of AMLO’s own making, but it’s hard not to feel for him. Between the realities of the situation on the ground and electoral politics, he’s not exactly overflowing with options. One hopes Sheinbaum will feel more freedom to act when she steps into the presidency.