But they hit so many buzzwords. 20 year old buzzwords even!

Give that man $31 million dollars, he’s doling out free life pro tips with his global economy crashes.

Come on now, they said you can have some at home. Now go and retreat into the tiny box that you pay half your salary on and enjoy your life peasant.

I would say that’s pretty silly.

That’s not very useful if there are no more elections.

They’ll hear “freedom of speech” as they are free to hate David Tennant, LGBT and black people all at the same time. No need to pick.

Well he is the one on Kemi Badenoch’s side.

Are we still talking about “skunk”? I’m pretty sure most of the stuff you find in “regulated” environments like Amsterdam is stronger than anything you’d find in the UK.

How much teeth do you like?

Well for one, I immediately deleted my comment because I think I misread the post title, so didn’t want to accuse OP. How can everyone see it still to vote and reply?

Two: it’s talking about the trolley problem and letting one die. Seems transphobic to let the girl die because she revealed she had a dick (if that is indeed the reason). That implication is kind of there. At the same time it could simply be that both would be great options, which I think is what OP intended and is why I deleted my comment.

Three: it’s a shitpost and it probably doesn’t need such analysis.

deleted by creator

I hadn’t really heard about his positions on Russia and was an interesting read. Now I will think twice before voting him as an independent if I ever happen to move to Islington.

Not really relevant here though is he?

Sounds like a waste of milkshake. We should be dunking him in something much less edible.

That seems… fantastical. I can’t imagine labour taking every single seat in the East Midlands at least.

It’s a pretty trashy tabloidy site for sure. Not sure I agree with not reporting on politicians ignoring issues, or flip flopping on previous pledges. The press shouldn’t really succumb to apathy at any point.

‘good thing to aim for’

Of course it is the end goal of the ultra wealthy to reduce their own tax burden and say it is good for the country.

It seems like all of the data is in the article to me. There are searchable tables on all of the criteria and the information comes from the publicly accessible TV show that is being studied. I’m sure if you trawled through every episode and charted the guests yourself, it would be easy to point out anything false.

It looks like the study is still ongoing and has not been “published” in that it has not been written up and peer reviewed, but this is an article about the raw data collected and drawing some conclusions from that alone.

Even if it were peer reviewed and published in a journal, the peers would not go through and verify the data before publication.

Why do political parties even receive donations? It doesn’t make sense to me that this is even a thing. It’s just open corruption.

Well he is pretty fancy. Born in a castle? And look at all those names!

That’s an interesting take on “Young people won’t be exploited as much”.